Categories
Comics General Blog

Rebuilding My Relationship to Comics #1: Suicide Squad

I used to really love comic books. I used to really love superhero comics in particular. But somewhere in the avalanche of movies and tie-ins and reboots I got buried and I never dug myself out. Perhaps the massive increase in volume did not correspond to an equally massive increase in quality. 

Or perhaps I just reflexively start hating things when other people like them.

Either way, now I only go to the comic book store by a sort of rote impulse – I look at the books on the shelves, I make eye contact with the familiar cowled faces, I buy nothing, and I go home.

I’m trying to avert this nullification by diving back into my comics collection and reconnecting with the material that made me crazy in the first place. And we’re starting at maybe the worst possible place for this journey to make any sense: the John Ostrander/Kim Yale/et al era of the Suicide Squad.

The Squad has gotten a bad rap in the last few years because of the godawful David Ayer movie, and then the, like, very okay James Gunn movie, and then the video game (I can’t remember if it was supposed to be good or bad, and I don’t care). But back in 1988, the Suicide Squad was just becoming itself, and the awkward wild nasty process of its birth is one of the most fascinating serial narratives in comics history.

The Suicide Squad is the brainchild of Amanda Waller – if you’re reading this, you probably know that. The Wall’s been getting a bad rap of late, with depictions of her in other media tending toward the utterly villainous. But Waller is more complicated than this, and in the hands of John Ostrander and Kim Yale she becomes one of the most challenging and interesting characters in the DC Universe. She’s not a good person, definitely not a hero, and she knows it, but she believes wholeheartedly that she is a necessary evil, that all the ways she’s mortgaged her soul were required to safeguard her children and her country. And she might be right: Ostrander and Yale write with surprising sensitivity (BY 1980s STANDARDS, NOT 2020s STANDARDS) about the struggles she faces as a Black woman in the non-stop white boy winter that is the American government. The dislike other characters hold for her is probed and considered, revealing ugly and unflattering and deeply real aspects to characters who might otherwise get away looking squeaky clean. I appreciate that.

There’s so much shading to each member of the Squad, and many of their adversaries too. Bronze Tiger, Deadshot, Nightshade, Count Vertigo, even Captain Boomerang – the stupidness of their gimmicks and bits elevates the poignancy of their mistakes and failings. The characters of the Suicide Squad, being disposable on an ontological level, are allowed to fail big, much bigger than more mainstream heroes. And they’re allowed to change significantly, sometimes for the worse. They are a mess of competing goals, desires, and schemes, and frequently that mess escalates into a total trainwreck. They do not slide into the currently popular (and perfectly fine when it’s used well) trope of Found Family. The members of the Squad hate each other and their masters at the beginning, and they still hate each other at the very end. Their relationships are all diseased by the power they wield over each other. In that way, this book is very honest about how ugly human relationships can get.

The thematics of power scale up in fascinating ways throughout the story, escalating into a type of late Cold War foreign policy kitsch which I find endlessly fascinating. The decision to depict the actual Reagan and actual HW Bush deploying the Squad to battle Commie superheroes will never not amuse me. The Suicide Squad trots the globe like a CIA-trained circus, wrecking up the place and usually making things worse for everyone around them. Much like the real CIA. This relationship between the Squad and the US government is a beautiful/ugly inversion of the relationship constructed every time Superman mentions that he’s fighting for Truth, Justice, and the American Way. Superman uses his god-like strength to maintain the ever-crumbling pedestal of American exceptionalism, papering over American evils with his own incontrovertible goodness. Conversely, anyone who associates with the Suicide Squad is dragged down to their level, made venal and violent by association. And since it’s the US government which invents the Squad, one must wonder who was the really venal and violent one in the first place.

I have to be clear that this book is full of plenty of material which now reads as cringe. Ideas that were progressive or groundbreaking in 1988, 1990, 1992 feel wildly embarrassing in 2025. The decision to color the skin of everyone from South Asia and the Middle East grey is consistently baffling to me. I know you guys had brown ink. All the Black characters have human-colored brown skin. Surely it couldn’t have been that hard to make a slightly lighter brown??? There is a lot of discomfort to be had here.

I still love the book, though, because of the thrill of its best and biggest moments, as well as the fervor of its convictions. Even cynicism was brighter and more alive in prior days.

Very, very, very few pop culture works, especially goofy old comic books, have the strength to confront and condemn their core concepts. The 2004 Battlestar Galactica is one of the few TV shows to risk this, and to my mind the penultimate mutiny storyline is one of the show’s all-time best. Similarly, the final arc of the Ostrander-Yale Suicide Squad is a complete deconstruction of its central premise, a final judgment delivered on the idea of government-enslaved supervillains press-ganged into performing “righteous” violence (and when you put it like that…). I have no qualms about spoilers for a work that concluded before I was born, but if you have that kind of fixation, keep scrolling until you see Batman again.

The last operation is a battle between the original Squad and a new, even worse Suicide Squad developed by another, especially shadowy arm of the US government. In the wake of the conflict, Waller dissolves the Squad and frees its members, admitting that her scheme did more harm than good. Deadshot and Count Vertigo confront each other atop a hill: Vertigo earlier asked for the option to be killed by Deadshot, rather than continue to live with bipolar disorder. Deadshot asks Vertigo one more time whether he wants to live or die. Vertigo hesitates, hesitates, hesitates, and then refuses Deadshot’s offer. They both depart.

This is an obvious literal denial of the book’s title. No more suicide, no more death. Count Vertigo, for all his SIGNIFICANT flaws, gets to live, and wants to. Deadshot, for all his depraved obsession with slaughter, does not kill again, and he makes that choice of his own volition. Both men are better than we have been led to believe.

Stalnoivolk, Soviet superhero, yeets Batman over a fence. Batman looks like he's saying "Oh crap!".
I love seeing Batman eat shit.

Supervillains are supposed to represent an outsize evil and perversity, the exact mirror to the outsize good of superheroes. But in the Ostrander-Yale Suicide Squad, whatever heights of villainy our Squaddies achieve, none of them match the craven brutality of The State – America, Russia, Israel, all of them that appear in the book. 

That idea, more than any other from this book, feels sharper than ever. And yet imagine hearing that from a comic book or a superhero movie today.

Categories
Book Review General Blog

Report on Best American Science Fiction & Fantasy 2024

Every December (or January) I buy the annual Best American Science Fiction & Fantasy (BASFF) collection. Every year I suffer a certain amount of trepidation, knowing that the guest editor will swing the pendulum on the selections in an unpredictable direction which may or may not align with my tastes. Some years it has been a real trainwreck (for me; I’m happy for anyone who enjoyed the years I didn’t [even though they’re wrong]). The risk is the point. I want to read stories I wouldn’t read elsewhere or of my own volition. Otherwise, I would just edit my own anthology every year.

This year the guest editor was Hugh Howey, the author of the Silo series. I’ve not read the Silo books or seen the Silo show, but my sister hates the show. My trepidation level was medium. Thankfully, Howey pulls it off. I enjoyed about 75% of the stories in this year’s anthology, which is a very solid run. I’ll restrict myself to mentioning only my very favorites here.

There are some big names here doing stylish bits. In “How It Unfolds”, James S.A. Corey pull off one of the only constructive SF stories about a guy being extremely divorced that I’ve ever read. Ann Leckie does colonization, evolution, and most importantly slug life in “The Long Game”. With “John Hollowback and The Witch”, Amal El-Mohtar delivers an account of restorative justice via witch which proves, for the perpetrator, even more painful than retributive justice aims to be.

There are a couple compelling stories in throwback styles. I deeply enjoyed the pulpy refreshments of Jonathan Louis Duckworth’s “Bruise-Eyed Dusk”, with its swamp witches and ride-able gators and hovering sadness. This is a fantasy that is willing to play and explore and surprise so we can enjoy its strange world. Christopher Rowe’s “The Four Last Things” is an explicit Cordwainer Smith tribute, and that’s a great taste. Wild and literary and straining at the edges of conception and perception, Rowe’s story sets all the brain bits sizzling, hopefully to productive ends.

If there was something to criticize in this year’s BASFF, when the vast majority of the stories were ones I enjoyed, it is that most of the work included is Not That Deep. The themes, the meanings, the feelings elicited are Right There. You get it at the beginning, you get it in the middle, and in the end you Get It. There’s nothing wrong with that; there are lots of things that shouldn’t be veiled or disguised or thematized until they’re hard to see. But after a while the thundering horns of right-thinking get a little hard to distinguish from the thundering horns of wrong-thinking. It’s all just thundering horns.

When I think about the best that speculative fiction – sci-fi and fantasy – is capable of, I think of a shadow play. When you watch shadow puppets, you’re not looking where the light is shining, you’re looking at what appears behind, the shape made by the play between light and object. It’s hard to write about real life, what literally is. It’s even harder to write about the things that are hidden behind real life: the abstract, uncertain, and ineffable. The mysteries. The addition of the blatantly unreal is the bright light producing the shadow of a mystery, which is what allows us to contemplate it.

There weren’t a lot of stories about the shadows in this year’s BASFF. But there were a few. Thomas Ha’s “Window Boy” draws up a unique and weird dystopia to ponder the mechanisms which close people off to the suffering of others, ending in an appropriately ambiguous place. Kel Coleman’s “Disassembling Light” confronts the selfishness of mentors who fail their students, using a wondrous and disgusting fantasy discipline as its canvas. The final two stories included deliver an exceptionally strong and troubling ending to the collection. In “Falling Bodies”, Rebecca Roanhorse pushes the limits of what we might consider agency for the truly alienated with a protagonist pinned between colonizers and manipulators on all sides. Sam J. Miller, a reliably strong contributor, closes up the shop with “If Someone You Love Has Become a Vurdalak”, a story that takes the vampire addiction metaphor to a truer and infinitely more painful place as it questions what lengths we ought to go to when imprisoned by poisonous love (and for once, when it comes to vampires, it is specifically familial love). 

It’s these last few stories I’m still thinking about after finishing the anthology. They press at uncertain and uncomfortable places, artfully, and ask something in return for the imagining. That’s the high heights to which sci-fi and fantasy can aspire. And the other stories in BASFF 2024 rest comfortably at the medium heights of sincerely entertaining and compelling and interesting, which is a height to which all of us unpublished writers must aspire 😂

If you read this year’s BASFF and have something to say, comment. I dare you. I will respond. Even if you didn’t read this year’s BASFF, comment-I-dare-you-I-will-respond.